Archive for the ‘Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection’ Category

The story of a “bad” check

CONSUMER FORUM

By Russ Van Arsdale, Executive Director, Northeast CONTACT
Posted April 28, 2013, at 2:08 p.m.

Here’s the story of a local consumer that we’ll call Sue. She wrote a check for a purchase she was making at a Bangor-area supermarket; the clerk scanned the check, which was rejected.

Sue was surprised, since she had more than enough money in her checking account to cover the purchase. The customer service person gave Sue a contact number and asked her to call Certegy Check Services. Before calling, Sue went to her bank and verified that there were sufficient funds to cover her check.

Then she called Certegy, and things got interesting. The instructions on the contact card asked callers to provide a driver’s license number, full name, current address, telephone and check numbers, check amount, checking account number and bank name. Sue was reluctant to provide that information.

After three calls a Certegy official explained the start of the problem.

It seems Sue had written a check six days earlier to the local branch of a major chain store. The check came back as having come from an invalid account. When Sue learned this, she and her husband went back to their bank and inquired further. The bank representative found that the check had never been received by the bank. The representative called Certegy, tracked down Sue’s check and asked for the account number. It turned out the account number did not match Sue’s account.

It appears that the problem originated with Sue’s check at the major chain. A scanner may have misread the account number, or a clerk may have copied it incorrectly. Whatever the case, it was not Sue’s fault. Certegy said the check for the chain store purchase would be re-submitted and that her account would be in good standing again. Originally, Sue had been told her check writing privileges would not be restored for seven days, as a matter of company policy. This concerned her, as she writes checks for prescription medications.

Sue wrote to Northeast CONTACT, and we forwarded her details to David Leach, principal examiner with Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection. He explained that Certegy, a licensed credit reporting agency in Maine, has been in business for nearly 30 years and is the largest check approval company in the United States.

Leach talked with an official at Certegy, who said his company had not been aware of Sue’s concerns regarding her prescriptions. Had Certegy been made aware of those concerns, the official said, Sue’s check writing privileges would have been restored immediately.

“As regulators, we hardly ever hear of such situations,” Leach told us. He said the check certification system generally works well and has prevented the passing of a large number of “bad” checks. Leach said the system is “designed to take the merchant out of the equation” and let the customer deal directly with Certegy or another similar firm.

He called Sue’s case an “outlier” situation, one which happens in a small minority of cases. On Friday, Sue said she has had no further problems cashing checks.

Sue is among a minority of vocal consumers who criticize Certegy’s multi-stop phone complaint system (call, explain, get transferred, explain again). Many who rant on blogs say they tire of the treatment and simply give up. Businesses using the service may consider a few customers’ anger worth the avoidance of a rising number of fraudulent checks.

Consumer Forum is a collaboration of the Bangor Daily News and Northeast CONTACT, Maine’s all-volunteer, nonprofit consumer organization. For assistance with consumer-related issues, including consumer fraud and identity theft, or for information, write Consumer Forum, P.O. Box 486, Brewer 04412, visit http://necontact.wordpress.com or email contacexdir@live.com.

Stay on top of your credit history

CONSUMER FORUM

By Russ Van Arsdale, executive director, Northeast Contact

Posted Feb. 24, 2013, at 6:41 p.m.

A consumer from Penobscot County reached out to us recently, saying she was afraid she might have let herself become a victim of identity theft.

Last year, the woman cashed in an annuity. Knowing she would have to report the transaction on this year’s income tax filing, she tried to email the pertinent information to her accountant. However, by missing one keystroke, she sent the message somewhere other than to the accountant. She worried about who might have received her personal and financial information and how it might be used.

A check with Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection reaffirmed our initial reaction: get a credit report from one of the three major reporting agencies, and do it FAST (at www.annualcreditreport.com — this is the truly free one). You’re entitled to one free report from each agency every year, and rotating your requests every four months keeps you abreast of your credit history and any errors or misdeeds that might affect that history.

The state credit protection folks also strongly encourage visiting the Federal Trade Commission’s website ( http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/features/feature-0014-identity-theft). Info there can help repair your damaged credit. But guess what: It’s not just the big three reporting agencies that keep track of your credit history.

There are at least several dozen companies that keep track of other things. Some collect information about medical conditions and data that consumers provide on insurance applications. Others track rental performance, including lease violations, damages, skips and unauthorized pets. Still others compile information on check writing, employment histories, criminal backgrounds and other personal information. A firm called The Work Number provides employment and income verification, according to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which says the company compiles data from large private sector payroll processors.

The CFPB is just beginning to get a handle on such operations, which comprise part of what’s known as alternative credit. For consumers without a traditional credit history, alternative credit can be a way to establish a good credit history, for example, by repeatedly paying multiple utility bills on time.

For people concerned about their info in a growing number of trackers’ hands, the CFPB offers some reassurance. The bureau requires companies that collect information about you to make that information available to you. Some offer a free report every year; others will give you a free report only if the information in the report has had some adverse effect on you. If you have to pay for a report, it can’t cost more than $11.50.

The CFPB says you may want to check with one or more of these specialty bureaus:

  1. If you think your identity has been stolen or someone has fraudulently cashed a check using your bank account.
  2. Before you apply for insurance.
  3. Before you apply for a lease.
  4. If, when applying for a job, your potential employer asks for your written okay to get a report.

For more information, visit www.consumerfinance.gov and search “you have a right to see specialty consumer reports, too.”

Consumer Forum is a collaboration of the Bangor Daily News and Northeast CONTACT, Maine’s all-volunteer, nonprofit consumer organization. For assistance with consumer-related issues, including consumer fraud and identity theft, or for information, write Consumer Forum, P.O. Box 486, Brewer 04412, visit http://necontact.wordpress.com or email contacexdir@live.com.

Financial Aid — WABI-TV

Video with Joy Hollowell

Russ Van Arsdale was in for Northeast Contact, to tell us about how to avoid student aid scams and to provide resources where interested parents and students can find information on how to sign up for the Free application for Federal Student Aid.

The first resource Russ talked about is the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. You can find information and how to apply at their website, fafsa.ed.gov . He suggests that you apply early, since there is only a certain amount of money each applicant shares. Waiting for the March deadline lowers your chances at how much aid you can qualify for.

The Finance Authority of Maine is another great resource to help teens and parents understand financial aid. You can visit their website at famemaine.com. FAME holds a series of meetings around the state that help people with filing out their FAFSA and other question or concerns about how to obtain financial aid.

The state’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection also has released a booklet on information about student loans called “Downeaster Common Sense Guide to Student Loans.” You can read this publication online at www.credit.maine.gov and click on Consumer Guides. The booklet is also available by writing the Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection. Their address is 35 State House Station, Augusta, ME 04333-0035 or by calling 1-800-332-8529.

If you’d like to add your voice to consumer matters in our area, or just have a question, drop Northeast Contact a line at:

P.O. Box 486
Brewer, ME 04412

Take care to avoid student aid scams – Bangor Daily News

By Russ Van Arsdale, Executive Director, Northeast CONTACT
Posted Jan. 19, 2013, at 5:31 p.m.

You get to the website on securing financial aid for education, and in rather small print it advises, “We are not affiliated with the Department of Education.”

However, in bold, bright letters, the site advises, “Maine Residents: State programs award on a first-come, first served basis. File immediately to avoid losing aid.” You can get help, it goes on, “for as little as $79.99.”

While websites such as this one aren’t scams, there are a number of free alternatives. As the website also indicates (in really small type), “The FAFSA [Free Application For Federal Student Aid] can be filed for free, without professional assistance at www.fafsa.ed.gov.”

So, what’s going on here? The for-profit website is one of many that promise “professional advisors” will provide “personal advice, consultation and review.” Some claim the process is so confusing that mere mortals lacking special training risk losing the maximum financial aid they might otherwise receive.

The U.S. Department of Education maintains the website that explains FAFSA ( http://www.fafsa.ed.gov/). It notes that thousands of consumers have complained about services that seemed more interested in collecting fees than in helping prospective students get financial aid.

These sites are not considered scams, unless the company promises something that it does not deliver. Usually, pitches are carefully worded to avoid making impossible claims. People may end up at these websites by guessing at site names; the for-profit folks have purchased site names that are likely guesses for just that reason.

Instead of paying for financial aid advice, the education department suggests talking with high school counselors, financial aid administrators at colleges and universities and the Federal Student Aid Information Center ( https://studentaid.ed.gov/contact). Most high school counselors welcome past as well as present students. Help from any of these sources is free, and the advice is worth noting.

The most important suggestion is to apply early. There’s one big pot of federal money to go around, and early applicants who qualify share that money. Waiting until the March deadline lowers your chances and shortens the time you have to correct any errors.

As with income tax filings, the most common error is forgetting to sign your application. You need a PIN, a four-digit number that becomes your electronic signature. Without that PIN, your application can’t be processed.

The Finance Authority of Maine helps teens all over Maine understand financial aid. Visit www.famemaine.com and read about College Goal Maine. There’s a series of free meetings around the state to provide individualized help in filing FAFSA, and there’s a virtual lab for those who can’t make an in-person meeting.

The state’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection recently published the Downeaster Common Sense Guide to Student Loans. Visit online at www.credit.maine.gov and click on “Consumer guides.” The booklet is also available in print by writing Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection, 35 State House Station, Augusta ME 04333-0035 or by calling 1-800-332-8529.

When searching online, watch out for claims that sound too good to be real. A “guarantee” of “at least $5,500” is worthless, since most students qualify for at least that much in unsubsidized loans. Be very wary of promises like, “I can guarantee aid if you give me your bank account number and a small fee.” Such claims are always scams.

Consumer Forum is a collaboration of the Bangor Daily News and Northeast CONTACT, Maine’s all-volunteer, nonprofit consumer organization. For assistance with consumer-related issues, including consumer fraud and identity theft, or for information, write Consumer Forum, P.O. Box 486, Brewer 04412, visit http://necontact.wordpress.com or email contacexdir@live.com.

Debt settlement firm settles with Maine for six figures

CONSUMER FORUM

By Russ Van Arsdale, executive director, Northeast Contact

Posted Dec. 22, 2012, at 2:10 p.m.

Here’s a short, sad story of a consumer from southern Maine who ran up more than a quarter million dollars in debt on 10 credit cards.

He hoped for a happy ending when he hired a debt settlement company called Legal Helpers Debt Resolution LLC. He paid the firm an upfront fee and monthly payments, believing its claim that it was effective in “helping consumers resolve their debt problems.”

Legal Helpers website trumpets that it is “the nation’s largest debt resolution law firm” with “offices in 50 states.” When Eric Wright went looking, he found an office in Thomaston but had a lot of trouble finding the attorney who was supposed to be there.

Wright is staff attorney for Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection. He was looking for the attorney on behalf of our southern Maine consumer, who was less than pleased with the iceberg-like progress Legal Helpers seemed to be making.

Wright investigated complaints from about two dozen Mainers, most of whom had dropped their business dealings with Legal Helpers.

“They didn’t appear to have done anything,” Wright told me last week. “There never seemed to be a method to the madness of what they were doing” in terms of getting clients’ debts reduced.

As other Mainers complained, Wright advised them to cease doing business with Legal Helpers. To that firm — and apparently a number of others in what Wright terms an “awful industry” — doing business means keeping a large chunk of clients’ money and putting some in accounts to be used for debt settlement. Problem was, Wright said, it might take two or three years to get enough money in those accounts to make debt settlement a reality.

By then, creditors got tired of waiting, and so did many of Legal Helpers’ estimated 15,000 to 20,000 clients nationwide. The firm did negotiate deals on two of our consumer’s accounts, which he paid off at 35 cents on the dollar. He did almost as well on his own, negotiating a rate of 45 cents on seven other accounts.

There was also the matter of registering to operate in Maine, which the company refused to do even though Maine law requires registration by debt settlement companies. Attorneys are exempt, unless those attorneys’ sole activity is settling debts. Legal Helpers claimed it had “partnerships” with attorneys who were licensed in Maine, and so should be exempt.

Wright turned the whole matter over to Maine’s attorney general, William Schneider. Last week, Schneider and Will Lund, superintendent of the Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection, announced a settlement with Legal Helpers and with The Mortgage Law Group LLP, a sister company of Legal Helpers that claimed to have a national reputation for representing homeowners in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure.

Under the agreement, the firms will pay $250,000 to be equitably distributed among more than 300 Maine consumers. The companies also agreed to stop charging monthly fees to present clients and will pay the state $15,000 to cover part of its administrative and investigative costs.

“These settlements send a strong message to others in the debt relief business that the state of Maine will not tolerate those who take advantage of Maine consumers in financial distress,” Schneider said in a news release.

In July, the state of Illinois reached a $2.1 million settlement with Legal Helpers.

Consumer Forum is a collaboration of the Bangor Daily News and Northeast CONTACT, Maine’s all-volunteer, nonprofit consumer organization. For assistance with consumer-related issues, including consumer fraud and identity theft, or for information, write Consumer Forum, P.O. Box 486, Brewer 04412, visit http://necontact.wordpress.com or email contacexdir@live.com.

Attorney General Schneider and Superintendent Lund Announce Settlements with Debt Management Companies

AUGUSTA — Attorney General William J. Schneider and Superintendent of the Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection William N. Lund jointly announced today that the State has entered into settlements with Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, LLC (“Legal Helpers”) and The Mortgage Law Group, LLP (“Mortgage Law”) that resolve the State’s concerns about their business practices under the Debt Management Services Act and the Unfair Trade Practices Act.

The companies operate as part of a large law firm located in Chicago, Illinois.  Legal Helpers was promoted as the largest debt resolution law firm in the country, with offices in 50 states, and Mortgage Law claimed to have a national reputation for representing homeowners in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure.  Neither company had an office in Maine, but had “partnerships” with several attorneys who were licensed in Maine.  New clients were enrolled by non-law office “strategic alliance partners” that also provided client services for the two companies.

Debt management service providers, including those who claim to arrange debt settlements and loan modifications, are regulated by the Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection.  Any attorney who is licensed to practice law in the State of Maine is exempt from registration as a debt management service provider unless the attorney’s exclusive activity is providing debt management services.  Superintendent Lund did not accept the companies’ claims that their partnerships with Maine attorneys entitled them to a legal exemption, and insisted that they register, which they refused to do.  The Attorney General contended that many Maine consumers never met or spoke with an attorney when they enrolled in the programs, and were misled by claims about their benefits.  Both Legal Helpers and Mortgage Law denied that they have violated any Maine laws.

Under the settlements, the companies agreed not to enroll any more Maine consumers in their programs, and will stop charging monthly fees to consumers who are still receiving their services.  In addition, the companies paid $250,000 in restitution which will be equitably distributed by the Attorney General to the more than 300 Maine consumers who enrolled in their programs.  An additional $15,000 has been paid by the companies to reimburse a portion of the state’s investigative and administrative expenses.

“These settlements send a strong message to others in the debt relief business that the State of Maine will not tolerate those who take advantage of Maine consumers in financial distress,” said Attorney General Schneider.

Superintendent Lund agreed, and said, “The Legislature took steps to protect Maine consumers by requiring debt management and credit counseling companies to obtain licenses and post surety bonds in order to conduct business in our state.  We urge Maine residents to verify the license status of any companies before doing business with those offering debt relief, since Mainers lose tens of thousands of dollars each year to unlicensed, out-of-state companies.”

Consumers are encouraged to contact the Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection to check the license status of debt management companies, and any disciplinary history in Maine, by calling 1-800-332-8529 (in-state) or 207-624-8527.  The Bureau also maintains a roster of licensed Debt Management Service Providers at www.Credit.Maine.gov, under the “Who we regulate” link on the homepage.

###

Maine’s Department of Professional and Financial Regulation Announces Cease and Desist Order Against “Woodhaven Advisors”

Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection says company is a predatory advance fee loan scam, falsely claiming to be located in Portland, Maine

GARDINER – Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection issued a Cease and Desist Order against Woodhaven Advisors this week and warned consumers about this nationwide phony consumer loan company falsely claiming to be located on Forest Avenue in Portland.

A consumer in Oklahoma contacted the Bureau seeking licensing information about Woodhaven Advisors, which maintains a professional-looking website (www.woodhavenadvisors.com).  The company offered the consumer a $10,000 loan in exchange for four upfront monthly “collateral payments” of $200.38 totaling more than $800.

A Bureau investigation revealed that no lender by the name of Woodhaven Advisors is located at the Portland address listed on the site.  As a result of the investigation, the Bureau issued a formal Cease and Desist Order against Woodhaven Advisors on November 27, 2012 (www.WoodhavenAdvisors11_27_12.com).

“Woodhaven Advisors is not registered with the Bureau to make or broker consumer loans to Maine or out-of-state borrowers,” said David Leach, Principal Examiner with the Bureau. “The company is also not listed in corporate filings with the Secretary of State’s Office.  Additionally, the Portland City Clerk’s office confirmed that no such company is located at the address listed on the company’s website, nor is Woodhaven Advisors registered to do business in Portland.”

Leach sent an inquiry to the company’s “customer care” e-mail address.  The company responded on November 26, 2012 with profane language.

Advance fee consumer loans are illegal in Maine and the remainder of the United States.  Consumers who fall victim to advance fee loan scams pay the upfront money, but never receive the promised loan funds.  When consumers follow through with transactions of this kind from fraudulent lenders, they are often directed to wire advance fee funds, using services such as Western Union, Money Gram or Green Dot, to Canada or another foreign country.

“Once the money is wired or mailed to the scammers, there is little if any chance of recovering those funds,” Leach added.

The on-line application from Woodhaven Associates asks applicants to disclose their Social Security number, street address, and telephone and email contact information.  The disclosure of personal financial information such as Social Security numbers, dates of birth and bank account information can lead to a subsequent identity theft incident and additional losses of funds.

The Bureau notes that Maine has issued licenses to many reputable lenders and loan brokers, and advises consumers to never wire or mail advanced, certified funds to unknown consumer lenders or brokers. The Bureau recommends that consumers deal only with known, licensed lenders and brokers, and encourages consumers to call the Bureau (207-624-8527) to verify the license status of any company engaged in the consumer loan business. The Bureau also maintains a roster of licensed supervised lenders and loan brokers on its website, www.Credit.Maine.gov .

###

The Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection is part of Maine’s Department of Professional and Financial Regulation, which encourages sound ethical business practices through high quality, impartial and efficient oversight of insurers, financial institutions, creditors, investment providers, and numerous professions and occupations.  Consumers can reach the Department at www.maine.gov/pfr.

Beware the 911 scam

CONSUMER FORUM

By Russ Van Arsdale, executive director of Northeast CONTACT
Posted Oct. 27, 2012, at 1:41 p.m.

As soon as he spoke with the woman last Tuesday, Bangor Police Officer Chris Blanchard knew she had been the victim of an attempted hoax.

The woman reported receiving a call that sounded suspicious. Her caller ID had read “Emergency 911,” and the man who called said he had a warrant for her arrest. He told the woman she should call Officer Richard Johnson at a phone number in Texas and arrange a payment to have the warrants voided.

Officer Blanchard called the number the woman had been given, and an extended song and dance began. Blanchard asked the man who answered if he could speak with the man’s supervisor; after waiting on hold for a few minutes, the same man came back on the line and tried to disguise his voice. Asked for his supervisor, the con artist tried the same ploy again.

Finally, Blanchard told the crook to stop his scam attempts and was told, in essence, “Just try and stop me.” With that, the crook hung up.

Blanchard called the Texas Attorney General’s office and learned people there were well aware of the scam. It’s been repeated across the country, and some people — unlike the woman who reported the incident to Bangor police — have been scammed for hundreds or even thousands of dollars.

The crooks play on some of our most basic emotions: fear of both public humiliation and legal trouble, even when we know we are innocent. They “spoof” the number of the phone they’re using to make it appear that the call is coming from a police agency. They threaten that failure to pay will have dire consequences.

In fact, they’re just blowing smoke. They’re hoping that you’ll wire them money (not recoverable) rather than telling police. They make hundreds of calls at random, hoping the people who answer will suspend their common sense.

“No one is ever going to do that,” said Bangor Police Sergeant Paul Edwards, when asked about the scam. Edwards said no legitimate law enforcement agency notifies targets of warrants by phone, let alone solicits bribes to erase the “crime.”

Variations of the scam are scary. Some crooks are on the way to becoming identity thieves, correctly stating a would-be victim’s Social Security Number or other personal information. Under duress, a victim might surrender enough additional data to allow the thief to steal his or her identity.

Other crooks pose as process servers, arriving at a potential victim’s workplace or home. Many scammers cite delinquency on loans, saying if the victim provides a debit card number, the payment will be made and the process server will go away. In fact, all that goes away is the victim’s money.

If you’re contacted by someone trying to collect a debt you don’t owe:

  1. Contact your local law enforcement agencies if you feel you are in immediate danger;
  2. Contact your banks and credit card companies;
  3. Notify the three major credit bureaus and request an alert be put on your file;
  4. If you have received a legitimate loan and want to verify that you do not have any outstanding obligation, contact the loan company directly.

Consumer Forum is a collaboration of the Bangor Daily News and Northeast CONTACT, Maine’s all-volunteer, nonprofit consumer organization. For assistance with consumer-related issues, including consumer fraud and identity theft, or for information, write Consumer Forum, P.O. Box 486, Brewer 04412, visit http://necontact.wordpress.com or email contacexdir@live.com.

Consumer Contact: Downeaster Common Sense Guide to Student Loans – WABI-TV

WABI-TV5 News Desk - October 15th 2012 12:16pm – Read more Morning News

Russ Van Arsdale was in for this week’s Consumer Contact to tell us about new booklet put out by the Maine Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection that outlines different ways to pay for higher education, such as scholarships, grants, and loans. There is also a glossary of terms students and parents should know when paying for or looking into college programs.

The booklets are available on the Bureau’s website credit.maine.gov or by calling at 1-800-332-8529.

FMI 8 tips for repaying your student loans from teachingdegree.org

TD Bank’s lost tapes procedures questioned | The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

Experts see signs of flaws in its handling of personal data and notification to customers, some of whom are upset.

By Jessica Hall jhall@pressherald.com
Staff Writer
October 10

Toronto-Dominion Bank

TD Bank made procedural errors when it lost computer tapes containing sensitive personal data, including Social Security numbers, and risked exacerbating potential problems by waiting more than six months to notify customers of the breach, security experts said Wednesday.

“It doesn’t sound like they were using proper controls. It’s not good practice to ship unencrypted backup tapes. It has become a lot less common for financial institutions to lose data these days,” said Robert Richardson, an independent computer-security analyst and former director of the San Francisco-based Computer Security Institute, an association of computer security professionals.

TD Bank, which has 54 branches in Maine, began notifying customers last week that tapes including names, addresses, Social Security numbers, account numbers and debit or credit card numbers were lost in March while being transferred between bank locations. The bank said it was not aware of any misuse of the information, but did not explain how the tapes were lost.

TD Bank, which has more than 7.4 million customers and more than 1,275 retail locations, also would not say how many customers were affected. TD Bank lost the tapes in Massachusetts, but said customers on the East Coast from Maine to Florida may have been affected.

“You can understand why a bank doesn’t want to disclose the number, but as a security professional, you have to assume the worst,” Richardson said. “There could be thousands of records on a backup tape. It could be an enormous number.”

Under Maine law, companies must disclose information about data breaches or losses “as expediently as possible and without unreasonable delay,” but no formal timetable dictates how or when companies must notify customers.

Some customers said Wednesday they were going to cancel their TD Bank accounts.

“It makes you think twice about the bank. I’ll probably change banks,” said Caleb Gannon of Yarmouth, who received a letter last week from TD Bank about the loss of his personal data.

One Scarborough customer, who declined to be named because she did not want to draw attention to her lost personal information, said she and her husband would be closing their joint account as soon as possible.

“The bank said it apologizes for any inconvenience. It’s way more than an inconvenience. It’s insulting,” the customer said. “The fact that it took so long generates more concerns and more questions.”

Liz Donnelly of Bangor said she had not been notified of any problems with her account, but was concerned about TD Bank’s lack of speed in informing customers.

“It definitely makes you nervous, but it’s been kind of happening to a lot of companies. But alerting people shouldn’t be a problem like that. TD Bank has become a big institution and I don’t know if that’s better,” Donnelly said.

Maine’s Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection said it has received complaints from some TD Bank customers.

“Sometimes,” Richardson said, “there’s good reason for the delay — such as working with law enforcement — or other times they’re just dragging their feet.”

TD Bank has offered free credit monitoring and identity theft protection to customers who were affected.

The bank said it did an internal investigation and notified law enforcement, but said there was no criminal investigation.

“We worked diligently to find the tapes and conduct a thorough investigation. Since this was not a data breach of any kind, there is no criminal investigation,” said TD Bank spokeswoman Rebecca Acevedo.

Sam Imandoust, a legal analyst with the Identity Theft Resource Center, a nonprofit organization in San Diego, said customers should carefully monitor their credit report and look for any suspicious activity on their accounts.

“It’s dangerous to have all that information out there. Was it unreasonable that it took seven months to disclose? What’s reasonable and prompt? Was it as expedient as possible?” Imandoust said. “I hope nobody gets a nasty surprise on their credit report.”

Identity Theft Resource Center, which tracks data breaches and lost information, said there have been 324 breaches of data nationally with more than 9 million financial records, including bank and credit card accounts, exposed so far this year. That compares with 419 data breaches with 22.9 million records exposed in 2011, the center said.

Since TD Bank is a federally chartered bank, state regulators don’t have much control over how customers get treated. The Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office declined to comment, and the Maine Attorney General’s Office did not return calls.

The Federal Trade Commission also declined to comment. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which oversees federally chartered banks, said it couldn’t comment on any specific bank or situation. TD Bank is a subsidiary of Toronto-Dominion Bank of Canada.

Other companies in Maine have also been affected by data breaches.

The biggest case involved Hannaford Bros. grocery chain, in which computer hackers stole the credit and debit card numbers of Hannaford shoppers from Dec. 7, 2007 to March 10, 2008. More than 4 million card numbers were exposed. About 1,800 fraudulent charges had been made by the time Hannaford announced the breach on March 17, 2008.

The other major data breach was reported in January 2007 and involved TJX, a retail chain that owns T.J. Maxx, Marshall’s and other stores.

Staff Writer Jessica Hall can be contacted at 791-6316 or at:

jhall@mainetoday.com

Related headlines

Thousands affected by TD Bank data loss

Related Documents

TD Bank’s letter notifying customers of lost data

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 29 other followers

%d bloggers like this: